Pardon v MESC Digest no. 18.09 Section 62(b) Cite as: Pardon v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued November 8, 1984 (Docket No. 82-219 979 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Larry A. Pardon Employer: Imperial Cab Docket no.: B79 16525 77987 Date of decision: November 8, 1984 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The claimant… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: The provision of finality in Section 32(b) “applies only to whether the employer is entitled to a credit to its rating account and not to benefits paid to the claimant.”
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Where a claimant is awarded back pay by an arbitrator for a contested discharge and he is paid full back pay minus the unemployment insurance benefits he earlier received from the MESC, the employer is liable for restitution to the MESC.
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The Board of Review has no statutory authority to waiver restitution under Section 62(a).
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: The 1980 amendment to Section 62(a) is to be given retroactive effect.
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: An administrative clerical error is good cause for a reconsideration of a determination no longer subject to review due to expiration of the protest period.
BOARD OF REVIEW HOLDING: “[W]here the Commission could only rely on an ‘administrative clerical error’ to order restitution of benefits …”, such error must be specified.
BOARD OF REVIEW HOLDING: Where the employer submits new information concerning credit weeks after the monetary determination has become final and after the claimant has received benefits based on the prior information submitted by the employer, the claimant is not required to repay the benefits improperly paid.
Sanders v MESC Digest no. 18.12 Section 62(b) Cite as: Sanders v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued April 30, 1957 (Docket No. 287-132). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Early Sanders Employer: Chrysler Corporation Docket no.: B56-769-18197 Date of decision: April 30, 1957 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The burden of establishing fraud by… Read More »