Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency Digest No. 20.09 MCL 600.6431 Cite as: Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency, unpublished decision of the Court of Claims, entered May 10, 2016 (Case No. 15-000202-MM). Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued July 18, 2017 (Docket No. 333181). Court: Court of… Read More »
UIA v Redlin Digest No. 19.11 19 USC § 2291(a)(5) Cite as: Unemployment Insurance Agency v Redlin, unpublished opinion of the Lenawee County Circuit Court, issued January 11, 2006 (Docket No. 182123). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Matthew Redlin Employer: N/A Date of decision: January 11, 2006 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Agency was not established… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: When a person is honorably discharged from military service before completing 365 days or more of continuous service, and that individual was discharged for being medically unfit, he or she is eligible for benefits. But if the reason for the honorable early discharge had been failure to meet physical standards, i.e. height, weight or physical fitness, then the person would be ineligible for benefits.
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: An employer will not be considered to be an “employee leasing company” unless the employer satisfiesall of the requirements of UA Rule 190.
Waknin v Chamberlain Digest no. 20.06 Cite as: Waknin v Chamberlain, 467 Mich 329 (2002). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: N/A Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: November 19, 2002 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: A criminal conviction after trial is admissible as substantive evidence of conduct at issue in a civil case arising out… Read More »
Seligman & Associates, Inc v MESC Digest no. 20.03 Section 44(2) Cite as: Seligman & Assoc, Inc v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued May 6, 1987 (Docket No. 85110). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Seligman & Associates, Inc. Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: May 6, 1987 View/download the full… Read More »
Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co Digest no. 9.05 Section 28a Cite as: Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co, 156 Mich App 176 (1986). Appeal pending: No Tribunal: Michigan Court of Appeals Appellant: Michigan Bell Telephone (employer) Docket no.: B82 5578 84393 Date of decision: July 24, 1986 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Even though claimant failed… Read More »
Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co Digest no. 9.05 Section 28a Cite as: Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co, 156 Mich App 176 (1986). Appeal pending: No Tribunal: Michigan Court of Appeals Appellant: Michigan Bell Telephone (employer) Docket no.: B82 5578 84393 Date of decision: July 24, 1986 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Even though claimant failed… Read More »
Oak Park Education Association, MEA/NEA v Oak Park Board of Education Digest no. 20.02 Section 30 and 31 Cite as: Oak Park Ed Ass’n, MEA/NEA v Oak Park Board of Ed, 132 Mich App 680 (1984). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Oak Park Board of Education Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: March 6, 1984 View/download the full… Read More »
The test of whether a person or business is liable for workers’ compensation benefits as the employer of a claimant is not a matter of terminology, oral or written, but of the realities of the work performed; control of the claimant is a factor, as is payment of wages, hiring and firing, and the responsibility for the maintenance of discipline, but the test of economic reality views these elements as a whole, assigning primacy to no single one.