UIA v. Tear Digest No. 3.09 Section 421.46 Cite as: Unemployment Insurance Agency v Tear, unpublished opinion of the State of Michigan Court of Appeals, issued December 10, 2015 (Docket No. 13-001038-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Rachel Tear Employer: N/A Date of decision: December 10, 2015 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Claimant is ineligible for unemployment… Read More »
Elliott’s Amusements, LLC v. Garrison Digest No. 17.23 Section 421.44 Cite as: Elliott’s Amusements, LLC v Garrison, unpublished opinion of the Ingham County Circuit Court, issued October 1, 2007 (Docket No. 07-251-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Ronald L. Garrison Employer: Elliott’s Amusements, LLC Date of decision: October 1, 2007 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Certain… Read More »
SUPREME COURT HOLDING: The governing statute, Section 27(f)(1), mandates coordination of claimant’s unemployment benefits with her pension benefits.
Brennan v Michigan Bell Telephone Co Digest no. 3.08 Section 27(f) Cite as: Brennan v Michigan Bell Tel Co, Unpublished Opinion of the Midland County Circuit Court, Issued February 3, 1998 (Docket No. 97-6843-AE-L). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John W. Brennan Employer: Michigan Bell Telephone Company Docket no.: B93-17227-130278 Date of decision: February 3, 1998 View/download… Read More »
Solgat v Accurate Mechanical Digest no. 3.05 Section 27(f) Cite as: Solgat v Accurate Mechanical, unpublished opinion of the Dickinson Circuit Court, issued June 29, 1995 (Docket No. D94-8517-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Clement Solgat Employer: Accurate Mechanical Docket no.: B91-16599-123338W Date of decision: June 29, 1995 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Where union employees receive a lump… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The claimant was not entitled to establish a benefit year under Section 46a(1), the alternative earnings qualifier, because he owned more than a 50% proprietary interest in the employing unit and Section 46(d) (now 46(g)) controls.
Polites v Flint Public Schools Digest no. 3.03 Section 27(f) Cite as: Polites v Flint Pub Schools, 132 Mich App 609 (1984). Appeal pending: No Claimant: James R. Polites Employer: Flint Public Schools Docket no.: B79 02190 66513 Date of decision: March 5, 1984 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Claimant contributed less than half the… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “It is a general rule in Michigan, as well as in other jurisdictions, that all statutes are prospective in their operation except in such cases as the contrary clearly appears from the context of the statute itself.”
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The cost of the benefit cannot be construed to mean the present actuarial value of the benefit. “This Court interprets the statutory use of the word “costs” in its plain and ordinary meaning that is, the amount actually spent for something (perhaps of much greater value)”.
Zajac v US Post Office Digest no. 3.04 Section 27(f) Cite as: Zajac v US Post Office, unpublished opinion of the Macomb Circuit Court, issued February 9, 1981 (Docket No. 80-2340 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John Zajac Employer: U. S. Post Office Docket no.: UCFE77 10907 56170 Date of decision: February 9, 1981 View/download… Read More »