Tag Archives: 28(1)(c)

Dow Chemical Co v Quinn – 7.02

Dow Chemical Co v Quinn Digest no. 7.02 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Dow Chemical Co v Quinn, unpublished opinion of the Midland Circuit Court, issued June 10, 1985 (Docket No. 82-001391-AE-G). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Wilbur F. Quinn Employer: Dow Chemical Company Docket no.: B74 5033(4) 65240 Date of decision: June 10, 1985 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT… Read More »

Haberman v The Stroh Brewery Co – 6.01

Haberman v The Stroh Brewery Co Digest no. 6.01 Section 28(1)(a), 28(1)(c) Cite as: Haberman v The Stroh Brewery Co, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued June 30, 1981 (Docket No. B77 3056 57623). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Charles Haberman Employer: The Stroh Brewing Company Docket no.: B77 3056 57623 Date of decision: June… Read More »

Chrysler Corp v Sellers – 7.08

Chrysler Corp v Sellers Digest no. 7.08 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Chrysler Corp v Sellers, 105 Mich App 715 (1981). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Woodrow W. Sellers Docket no.: B76 9783 RM 58420 Employer: Chrysler Corporation Date of decision: April 22, 1981 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where a retired auto worker excludes auto plants… Read More »

Heikkinen v Ore-Ida Foods, Inc – 7.10

Heikkinen v Ore-Ida Foods, Inc Digest no. 7.10 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Heikkinen v Ore-Ida Foods, Inc, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued July 31, 1980 (Docket No. B77 18316 58612). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Mabel B. Heikkinen Employer: Ore-Ida Foods, Inc. Docket no.: B77 18316 58612 Date of decision: July… Read More »

General Foods Corp v Nelson – 4.12

General Foods Corp v Nelson Digest no. 4.12 Sections 27(c), 48 Cite as: General Foods Corp v Nelson, unpublished opinion of the Calhoun County Circuit Court, issued June 18, 1980 (Docket No. B78 716 60234). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Nella L. Nelson Employer: General Foods Corporation Docket no.: B78 716 60234 Date of decision: June 18,… Read More »

Doe v Robert Carter Corp – 7.16

Doe v Robert Carter Corp Digest no. 7.16 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Doe v Robert Carter Corp, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued June 6, 1980 (Docket No. B78 02345 61033). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Arvin N. Doe Employer: Robert Carter Corporation Docket no.: B78 02345 61033 Date of decision: June… Read More »

Bateman v Jackson Industrial Manufacturing Co – 7.17

Bateman v Jackson Industrial Manufacturing Co Digest no. 7.17 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Bateman v Jackson Industrial Manufacturing Co, unpublished opinion of the Kent County Circuit Court, issued May 5, 1980 (Docket No. 80 29462 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Robert L. Bateman Employer: Jackson Industrial Manufacturing Company Docket no.: B77 10805 RO2 62489 Date of decision: May 5,… Read More »

Winstead v MESC – 7.12

Winstead v MESC Digest no. 7.12 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Winstead v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, issued February 19, 1980 (Docket No. 79 17067 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Mary Winstead Employer: N/A Docket no.: B76 18265 57846, et al. Date of decision: February 19, 1980 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING:… Read More »

Hinga v Brown Co – 7.06

Hinga v Brown Co Digest no. 7.06 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Hinga v Brown Co, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued January 25, 1980 (Docket No. B76 2157 50644). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Edward G. Hinga Employer: Brown Company Docket no.: B76 2157 50644 Date of decision: January 25, 1980 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »

McKentry v MESC – 7.28

McKentry v MESC Digest no. 7.28 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: McKentry v MESC, 99 Mich App 277 (1980). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Bessie McKentry, et al. Employer: Muskegon Area Intermediate School District Docket no.: 43884 Date of decision: August 11, 1980 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “A plain reading of the statute does not… Read More »