CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Claimant’s employment as the State Racing Commissioner was a major non-tenured policymaking or advisory position and therefore excluded employment under Section 43(o)(iii)(E) of the Michigan Employment Security Act.
Mapes v Alreco Metals, Inc Digest no. 10.62 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Mapes v Alreco Metals, Inc, unpublished opinion of the Berrien Circuit Court, issued August, 1989 (Docket No. 86-1287-AE-H). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John W. Mapes Employer: Alreco Metals, Inc. Docket no.: B85-04697-99955 Date of decision: August, 1989 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: A rotating… Read More »
Levesque v Meijer Thrifty Acres Digest no. 10.63 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Levesque v Meijer Thrifty Acres, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued July 24, 1989 (Docket No. 111618). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Nancy Levesque Employer: Meijer Thrifty Acres Docket no.: B87-02390-105594 Date of decision: July 24, 1989 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: A weighted average of the tax rate of the employer’s two predecessors which were merged into it must be used to determine the employer’s tax rate under Section 19 and 22(e)(3).
Frankenstein v Independent Roofing & Siding Digest no. 10.65 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Frankenstein v Independent Roofing & Siding, unpublished opinion of the Delta Circuit Court, issued June 16, 1989 (Docket No. 88-8956-AE). Appeal pending: No. Claimant: Terry J. Frankenstein Employer: Independent Roofing & Siding Docket no.: B87-12977-106695W Date of decision: June 16, 1989 View/download the full decision… Read More »
Devyak v Faygo Beverages Digest no. 10.85 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Devyak v Faygo Beverages, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued May 1, 1989 (Docket No. 88-815646-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Beverly J. Devyak Employer: Faygo Beverages Docket no.: B87-12781-106535W Date of decision: May 1, 1989 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: An employer… Read More »
Bongiorno v Orchard Ford/Lincoln Digest no. 10.66 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Bongiorno v Orchard Ford/Lincoln, unpublished opinion of the Berrien Circuit Court, issued April 25, 1989 (Docket No. 88-214-AL-Z). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Randy Bongiorno Employer: Orchard Ford/Lincoln Docket no.: B87-03625-105495W Date of decision: April 25, 1989 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Unethical, but not… Read More »
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where a claimant has a sincere belief that religion required him or her to refrain from the work in question they may invoke the protections of the First Amendment. It is not required that the claimant belong to an established religious sect for the claimant’s religious beliefs to be protected.
Broyles v Aeroquip Corp Digest no. 12.30 Section 29(1)(b) Cite as: Broyles v Aeroquip Corp, 176 Mich App 175 (1989). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Thomas Broyles Employer: Aeroquip Corporation Docket no.: B86 05457 104075 Date of decision: March 21, 1989 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Use of vulgar or abusive language can constitute… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Services performed by the claimant through a co-op program were excluded from covered employment under the Michigan Employment Security Act.