Bonnette v West Ottawa Schools Digest no. 5.10 Section 27(i) Cite as: Bonnette v West Ottawa Schools, 165 Mich App 460 (1987); lv den 430 Mich 870 (1988). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Julie Bonnette, et al. Employer: West Ottawa Public School Docket no.: B84 01754 96313 Date of decision: August 27, 1987 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »
Smith v Andrews on the Corner Digest no. 10.47 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Smith v Andrews on the Corner, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued July 22, 1987 (Docket No. 94071). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Ollie Smith Employer: Andrews on the Corner Docket no.: B85 02586 99533W Date of decision: July 22, 1987 View/download… Read More »
Ryan v Macomb-Oakland Regional Center Digest no. 10.34 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Ryan v Macomb-Oakland Regional Ctr, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued May 22, 1987 (Docket No. 92138). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Michael Ryan Employer: Macomb-Oakland Regional Center Docket no.: B82 23667 90219 Date of decision: May 22, 1987 View/download the… Read More »
Seligman & Associates, Inc v MESC Digest no. 20.03 Section 44(2) Cite as: Seligman & Assoc, Inc v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued May 6, 1987 (Docket No. 85110). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Seligman & Associates, Inc. Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: May 6, 1987 View/download the full… Read More »
UAW v Brock Digest no. 19.01 Section 231(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 Cite as: UAW v Brock, 816 F2d 761 (DC Cir 1987). Appeal pending: No Plaintiff: International Union U.A.W., et al. Defendant: William Brock, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: April 24, 1987 View/download the full decision U.S. COURT OF… Read More »
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HOLDING: When a State denies receipt of a benefit because of conduct mandated by religious belief, thereby putting substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and violate his beliefs, that denial must be subjected to strict scrutiny and can be justified only by proof of a compelling state interest. The First Amendment protects the free exercise rights of employees who adopt religious beliefs or convert from one faith to another after being hired.
Degi v Varano Glass Co Digest no. 10.19 Section 29(1)(a) and 29(8) Cite as: Degi v Varano Glass Co, 158 Mich App 695 (1987). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Paul G. Degi Employer: Varano Glass Company Docket no.: B84 09066 97679W Date of decision: January 27, 1987 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where an… Read More »
Taylor v United States Postal Service Digest no. 7.27 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Taylor v US Postal Service, 163 Mich App 77 (1987). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Geneva Taylor Employer: United States Postal Service Docket no.: UCF84 13552 98942W Date of decision: View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: A claimant must establish she is… Read More »
City of Saginaw v Lindquist Digest no. 10.04 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: City of Saginaw v Lindquist, sub nom Parks v ESC, 427 Mich 224 (1986). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Nancy A. Lindquist Employer: City of Saginaw Docket no.: B81 06822 RO1 78455 Date of decision: December 26, 1986 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING:… Read More »
Parks v MESC Digest no. 12.11 Section 29(1)(b) Cite as: Parks v MESC, 427 Mich 224 (1986). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Anne B. Parks Employer: Detroit Public Schools Docket no.: B78 12258 66005 Date of decision: December 26, 1986 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: An individual whose employment is terminated for failing to pay agency… Read More »