Breshgold v MESC Digest no. 7.25 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Breshgold v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued February 24, 1978 (Docket No. 77-708893-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Michael S. Breshgold Employer: United States Navy Docket no.: UCX75 14953 RO 49887 Date of decision: February 24, 1978 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT… Read More »
Breshgold v MESC Digest no. 7.25 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Breshgold v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued February 24, 1978 (Docket No. 77-708893-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Michael S. Breshgold Employer: United States Navy Docket no.: UCX75 14953 RO 49887 Date of decision: February 24, 1978 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT… Read More »
Mikolaicziak v MESC Digest no. 7.07 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Mikolaicziak v MESC, 40 Mich App 61 (1972). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Leo J. Mikolaicziak, et al. Employer: Twin Oaks Golf Club, Inc. Docket no.: B69 573 37067 Date of decision: April 25, 1972 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: (1) Unpaid service as a… Read More »
Bolles v MESC Digest no. 7.01 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Bolles v MESC, 361 Mich 378 (1960). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Lewis F. Bolles Employer: Continental Motors Corporation Date of decision: September 16, 1960 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: “. . . the test properly to be employed is that of genuine attachment to the labor market.”… Read More »
Spohn v MESC Digest no. 7.26 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Spohn v MESC, 342 Mich 432 (1955). Appeal pending: No Claimant: James N. Spohn Employer: J.A. Utley Company Docket no.: B53 1530 15235 Date of decision: June 6, 1955 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Claimant is able and available to perform full time work if the… Read More »
Swenson v MESC Digest no. 7.05 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Swenson v MESC, 340 Mich 430 (1954). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Bessie Swenson Employer: Battle Creek Food Company Docket no.: B1 1131 13361 Date of decision: September 8, 1954 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Claimants are not unavailable for benefits because they cannot work from sundown… Read More »
Ashford v Unemployment Comp. Commission Digest no. 7.24 Sections 28(1)(c), 33 Cite as: Ashford v Unemployment Compensation Commission, 328 Mich 428 (1950). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Violet Ashford Employer: Kelsey Hayes Date of decision: Sept. 11, 1950 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: The introduction into evidence of the file materials for a claim for unemployment… Read More »
Dwyer v UCC Digest no. 7.04 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Dwyer v UCC, 321 Mich 178 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John Dwyer Employer: Packard Motor Car Co. Docket no.: B6 18326 5058 Date of decision: May 18, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) The claimant has the burden of proof as to eligibility. (2) A… Read More »
Ford Motor Co v UCC Digest no. 7.03 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Ford Motor Co v UCC, 316 Mich 468 (1947). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Drusilla Koski Employer: Ford Motor Company Docket no.: B4 3872 1751 Date of decision: January 6, 1947 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: “There is nothing in the statute to justify the… Read More »