Category Archives: 10. Voluntary Leaving

MES Act sec. 29(1)(a)

Yoder v ABC Heating & Supply – 10.26

Yoder v ABC Heating & Supply Digest no. 10.26 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Yoder v ABC Heating and Supply, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued January 2, 1980 (Docket No. B78 07654 62185). Appeal pending: No Claimant: David Yoder Employer: ABC Heating and Supply Docket no.: B78 07654 62185 Date of decision:… Read More »

Schultz v Grede Foundries, Inc – 10.03

Schultz v Grede Foundries, Inc Digest no. 10.03 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Schultz v Grede Foundries, unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued September 11, 1979 (No. 78 3191); lv den 407 Mich 958 (1980). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Rosemarie Schultz Employer: Grede Foundries, Inc. Docket no.: B76 7742 51982 Date of decision: September 11,… Read More »

Kmiec v Ole Tacos – 10.54

Kmiec v Ole Tacos Digest no. 10.54 Sections 29(1)(a), 29(1)(b) Cite as: Kmiec v Ole Tacos, unpublished opinion of the Ottawa Circuit Court, issued August 22, 1979 (Docket No. 78-4545-AV). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Charles M. Kmiec Employer: Ole Tacos Docket no.: B77 2254 56841 Date of decision: August 22, 1979 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT… Read More »

Engel v Derthick Associates, Inc – 10.17

Engel v Derthick Associates, Inc Digest no. 10.17 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Engel v Derthick Assoc, Inc, unpublished opinion of the Oakland Circuit Court, issued July 6, 1979 (No. 78-179125 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Blanche Engel Employer: Derthick Associates, Inc. Docket no.: B77 875 55320 Date of decision: July 6, 1979 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT… Read More »

Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co – 10.52

Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co Digest no. 10.52 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co, No. 78-12255-AE, Muskegon Circuit Court (July 6, 1979). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Roxanne Miller Employer: Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Company Docket no.: B76 17106 RO 54539 Date of decision: July 6, 1979 View/download the full decision… Read More »

Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station – 10.21

Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station Digest no. 10.21 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued August 21, 1978 (Docket No. FSB76 13211 55248). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Dennis Wasolaskus Employer: Tom’s Grandville Station Docket no.: FSB76 13211 55248 Date of decision: August 21, 1978… Read More »

Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store – 10.25

Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store Digest no. 10.25 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued July 27, 1978 (Docket No. B76 9343 54085). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Garth H. Holmquist Employer: Swiss Colony Store Docket no.: B76 9343 54085 Date of decision: July… Read More »

Goebel v Bank of the Commonwealth – 10.101

Goebel v Bank of the Commonwealth Digest no. 10.101 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Goebel v Bank of the Commonwealth, unpublished opinion of the Macomb Circuit Court, issued March 15, 1978 (Docket No. 77-6525-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Joyce Goebel Employer: Bank of the Commonwealth Docket no.: 77-6525-AE Date of decision: March 15, 1978 View/download the… Read More »

Giebel v State of Michigan – 10.29

Giebel v State of Michigan Digest no. 10.29 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Giebel v State of Michigan, unpublished opinion of the Midland Circuit Court, issued October 1, 1974 (Docket No. B71 2038 40969). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Richard A. Giebel Employer: State of Michigan Docket no.: B71 2038 40969 Date of decision: October 1, 1974 View/download the… Read More »

Echols v MESC – 10.49

Echols v MESC Digest no. 10.49 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Echols v MESC, 380 Mich 87 (1968). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Bruce Echols Employer: John Kraus, d.b.a. Checker Cab Docket no.: B63 5770 31807 Date of decision: February 9, 1968 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: “[T]he loss of a claimant’s prerequisites from continued employment,… Read More »