Tag Archives: Voluntary leaving

Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co – 10.52

Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co Digest no. 10.52 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Miller v Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Co, No. 78-12255-AE, Muskegon Circuit Court (July 6, 1979). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Roxanne Miller Employer: Soo Coin Wholesale Vending Company Docket no.: B76 17106 RO 54539 Date of decision: July 6, 1979 View/download the full decision… Read More »

Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station – 10.21

Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station Digest no. 10.21 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Wasolaskus v Tom’s Grandville Station, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued August 21, 1978 (Docket No. FSB76 13211 55248). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Dennis Wasolaskus Employer: Tom’s Grandville Station Docket no.: FSB76 13211 55248 Date of decision: August 21, 1978… Read More »

Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store – 10.25

Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store Digest no. 10.25 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Holmquist v Swiss Colony Store, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review, issued July 27, 1978 (Docket No. B76 9343 54085). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Garth H. Holmquist Employer: Swiss Colony Store Docket no.: B76 9343 54085 Date of decision: July… Read More »

Giebel v State of Michigan – 10.29

Giebel v State of Michigan Digest no. 10.29 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Giebel v State of Michigan, unpublished opinion of the Midland Circuit Court, issued October 1, 1974 (Docket No. B71 2038 40969). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Richard A. Giebel Employer: State of Michigan Docket no.: B71 2038 40969 Date of decision: October 1, 1974 View/download the… Read More »

Echols v MESC – 10.49

Echols v MESC Digest no. 10.49 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Echols v MESC, 380 Mich 87 (1968). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Bruce Echols Employer: John Kraus, d.b.a. Checker Cab Docket no.: B63 5770 31807 Date of decision: February 9, 1968 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: “[T]he loss of a claimant’s prerequisites from continued employment,… Read More »

Larson v MESC – 10.50

Larson v MESC Digest no. 10.50 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Larson v MESC, 2 Mich App 540 (1966). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Paul A. Larson Employer: Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Docket no.: UCX63 3742 31606 Date of decision: March 22, 1966 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “Claimant was forced to cease working because… Read More »

Lyons v MESC – 10.51

Lyons v MESC Digest no. 10.51 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Lyons v MESC, 363 Mich 201 (1961). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Charles Lyons Employer: Chrysler Corporation Docket no.: B57 5079 20232 Date of decision: April 26, 1961 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Section 29(1)(a) is applicable to separations from work outside of Michigan. The… Read More »

Setta v Chrysler Corp – 10.13

Setta v Chrysler Corp Digest no. 10.13 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Setta v Chrysler Corp, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued September 3, 1959 (No. 301-977). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Richard Setta Employer: Chrysler Corporation Docket no.: B58 6122 22034 Date of decision: September 3, 1959 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: A claimant… Read More »

Borg v MUCC – 10.23

Borg v MUCC Digest no. 10.23 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Borg v MUCC, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued February 28, 1955 (Docket No. B54 749 15677). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Edgar Borg Employer: Ansaldi Tool & Engineering Docket no.: B54 749 15677 Date of decision: February 28, 1955 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT… Read More »

Copper Range Co v UCC – 10.01

Copper Range Co v UCC Digest no. 10.01 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Copper Range Co v UCC, 320 Mich 460 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: James W. Austin, et al. Employer: Copper Range Co. Docket no.: B5 9204 2910 Date of decision: April 5, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where employees are threatened… Read More »