Tag Archives: Connected with work

Physicians Health Plan of Mid Michigan v. Chapman – 12.149

Physicians Health Plan of Mid Michigan v. Chapman Digest No. 12.149 Section 421.29(1)(b) Cite as: Physicians Health Plan v Chapman, unpublished opinion of the Ingham County Circuit Court, issued December 16, 2008 (Docket No. 08-628-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Shanika Chapman Employer: Physicians Health Plan of Mid Michigan Date of decision: December 16, 2008 View/download… Read More »

Banks v Ford Motor Co – 12.06

Banks v Ford Motor Co Digest no. 12.06 Section 29(1)(b) Cite as: Banks v Ford Motor Co, 123 Mich App 250 (1983). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John L. Banks Employer: Ford Motor Company Docket no.: B79 06738 67680 Date of decision: February 10, 1983 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “Disqualification may be based on… Read More »

Benaske v General Telephone Co of Michigan – 12.28

Benaske v General Telephone Co of Michigan Digest no. 12.28 Section 29(1)(b) Cite as: Benaske v Gen Tel Co of Michigan, unpublished opinion of the Isabella County Circuit Court, issued March 5, 1980 (Docket No. 79 008439 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Raymond O. Benaske Employer: General Telephone Co. Docket no.: B77 444 55273 Date of… Read More »

General Motors Corp v Belcher – 12.27

General Motors Corp v Belcher Digest no. 12.27 Section 29(1)(b) Cite as: General Motors Corp v Belcher, unpublished opinion of the Wayne Circuit Court, issued October 3, 1979 (Docket No. 78-832-459 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Frank Belcher Employer: General Motors Corp. Docket no.: B77 3823 55598 Date of decision: October 3, 1979 View/download the full decision… Read More »

Reed v. Employment Security Commission – 12.73

Reed v. Employment Security Commission Digest No. 12.73 Section 421.29 Cite as: Reed v MESC, 364 Mich 395 (1961). Court: Supreme Court of Michigan Appeal pending: No Claimant: Willie Reed Employer: Grant Brothers Foundry Company Date of decision: September 23, 1961 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Claimant was not discharged for misconduct connected to his… Read More »