Tag Archives: Due process

Saylor v. C.L. Rieckhoff Co. – 16.95

Saylor v. C.L. Rieckhoff Co. Digest No. 16.95 Section 421.62 Cite as: Saylor v C L Rieckhoff Co, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission, issued August 2, 2017 (Docket No. 16-029832-252337W). Court: Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission Appeal pending: No Claimant: Brian Saylor Employer: C.L. Rieckhoff Co. Date of decision: August 2, 2017 View/download… Read More »

Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency – 20.09

Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency Digest No. 20.09 MCL 600.6431 Cite as: Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency, unpublished decision of the Court of Claims, entered May 10, 2016 (Case No. 15-000202-MM). Bauserman v Unemployment Insurance Agency, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued July 18, 2017 (Docket No. 333181). Court: Court of… Read More »

Hicks v Colvin – 19.17

Hicks v Colvin Digest No. 19.17 Due Process/Fraud Cite as: Hicks v Colvin, 214 F Supp 3d 627 (ED KY 2016). Court: District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky Appeal pending: Yes Claimant: Amy Jo Hicks Agency: Social Security Administration Date of decision: October 12, 2016 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Due process requires individuals to… Read More »

Wickham v. Adecco CS, Inc. – 18.23

Wickham v. Adecco CS, Inc. Digest No. 18.23 Section 421.32(a) Cite as: Wickham v Adecco CS, Inc, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Administrative Hearing System, issued September 28, 2016 (Docket No. 16-021211). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Margaret M. Wickham Employer: Adecco CS Inc. Date of decision: September 28, 2016 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Under… Read More »

Article: Legally Insufficient Notice and UIA Determinations

Legally Insufficient Notice and Unemployment Insurance Agency Determinations By: Leila McClure, Marina Hunt, and Steve Gray University of Michigan Law School Unemployment Insurance Clinic April 2016 Sections: 421.32a, 421.33 Download a PDF version of this article Frequently, unemployment insurance claimants and employers must rely only on short letter determinations and redeterminations (notices) they receive from… Read More »

Rosewarne, d/b/a Crossroads Imports v Dyktor – 10.42

Rosewarne, d/b/a Crossroads Imports v Dyktor Digest no. 10.42 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Rosewarne v Dyktor, unpublished opinion of the Ingham County Circuit Court, issued February 26, 1985 (Docket No. 82-28690 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Denise R. Dyktor Employer: Mary Anne Rosewarne, d/b/a Crossroads Imports Docket no.: B81 01118 76258 Date of decision: February 26, 1985 View/download… Read More »

Snyder v RAM Broadcasting – 16.34

Snyder v RAM Broadcasting Digest No. 16.34 Section 29 Cite as: Snyder v RAM Broadcasting, unpublished opinion of the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, issued April 26, 1983 (Docket No. 8223718AE). Court: Washtenaw Circuit Court Appeal pending: No Claimant: Ann Snyder Employer: RAM Broadcasting Date of decision: April 26, 1983 View/download the full decision HOLDING: The… Read More »