Vanderlaan v Tri-County Community Hospital Digest no. 4.25 Section 48(2) Cite as: Vanderlaan v Tri-County Community Hosp, 209 Mich App 328 (1995). Appeal pending: No Claimant: James Vanderlaan Employer: Tri-County Community Hospital Docket no.: B91-00104-117753 Date of decision: March 20, 1995 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: The MES Act does not require a contractual right to… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The claimant was not entitled to establish a benefit year under Section 46a(1), the alternative earnings qualifier, because he owned more than a 50% proprietary interest in the employing unit and Section 46(d) (now 46(g)) controls.
Oak Park Education Association, MEA/NEA v Oak Park Board of Education Digest no. 20.02 Section 30 and 31 Cite as: Oak Park Ed Ass’n, MEA/NEA v Oak Park Board of Ed, 132 Mich App 680 (1984). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Oak Park Board of Education Docket no.: N/A Date of decision: March 6, 1984 View/download the full… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “It is a general rule in Michigan, as well as in other jurisdictions, that all statutes are prospective in their operation except in such cases as the contrary clearly appears from the context of the statute itself.”