MESC v Bennett Fuel Co – 2.15
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Good cause for late protest of contribution rate established by showing that delay in filing an appeal was due to the misconduct of employer’s bookkeeper.
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Good cause for late protest of contribution rate established by showing that delay in filing an appeal was due to the misconduct of employer’s bookkeeper.
Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC Digest no. 2.17 Section 41(2) Cite as: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued September 27, 1994 (Docket No. 145657). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc. Docket no.: L88-08050-2003 Date of decision: September 27, 1994 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »
Peter McCreedy Trucking Co v MESC Digest no. 2.11 Sections 15, 18 Cite as: Peter McCreedy Trucking Co v MESC, unpublished memorandum of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued August 26, 1994 (Docket No. 156798). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Peter McCreedy Trucking Company Docket no.: L90-11810-RO1-2187 Date of decision: August 26, 1994 View/download the… Read More »
MESC v Regis Associates Digest no. 2.16 Section 18(d)(2) Cite as: MESC v Regis Assoc, unpublished memorandum of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued May 27, 1994 (Docket No. 162000). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Regis Associates Docket no.: L90-08433-2113 Date of decision: May 27, 1994 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where employer’s… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where employer requested reclassification from contributing to reimbursing status more than one year after notice of determination of status was mailed, the one year limitation bars retroactive reconsideration of employer’s status.
MESC v NL Industries (USA), Inc Digest no. 2.09 Sections 21, 32a Cite as: MESC v NL Industries (USA), Inc, unpublished opinion of the Oakland County Circuit Court, issued January 5, 1994 (Docket No. 93-459745-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: NL Industries (USA), Inc. Docket no.: L90-10851-2103 Date of decision: January 5, 1994 View/download the full decision… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee was an employing unit pursuant to Section 40 and, therefore, by definition an “employer subject to this Act” under Section 41(2)(a). Therefore, employer Bruce & Roberts Inc. is a successor, having acquired 75% or more of Balderstone assets by means of bankruptcy.
R F Molitoris, DDS v MESC Digest no. 2.13 Sections 11(g), 18(d), 32a Cite as: R F Molitoris, DDS v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Macomb County Circuit Court, issued January 21, 1993 (Docket No. 92-3446-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Wanda Forbes Employer: R.F. Molitoris, D.D.S. Docket no.: L90-06544-2224 Date of decision: January 21, 1993 View/download the full… Read More »
Trumble’s Rent-L-Center v MESC Digest no. 2.18 Sections 18(d), 21 Cite as: Trumble’s Rent-L-Center v MESC, 197 Mich App 229 (1992). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Trumble’s Rent-L-Center, Inc. Docket no.: L88-14843-1985 Date of decision: December 7, 1992 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where employer submitted a missing quarterly report more than 30 days after… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where a vertical merger takes place involving multiple corporate entities related as parent – subsidiary, the merger transactions occur in sequence, not simultaneously.