CTC Acquisition CO, LLC v. State of Michigan Digest No. 2.23 Section 421.22, Section 421.41 Cite as: CTC Acquisition CO, LLC v State of Michigan, unpublished opinion of the Kent County Circuit Court, issued November 10, 2008 (Docket No. 2008-06293-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: CTC Acquisition Co., LLC Docket no.: No. 2008-06293-AE Date… Read More »
Elliott’s Amusements, LLC v. Garrison Digest No. 17.23 Section 421.44 Cite as: Elliott’s Amusements, LLC v Garrison, unpublished opinion of the Ingham County Circuit Court, issued October 1, 2007 (Docket No. 07-251-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Ronald L. Garrison Employer: Elliott’s Amusements, LLC Date of decision: October 1, 2007 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Certain… Read More »
MESC v Monkman Construction Digest no. 2.20 Sections 18(d)(2), 32a Cite as: MESC v Monkman Constr, unpublished per curiam Court of Appeals, issued May 7, 1996 (Docket No. 176053). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Monkman Construction Docket no.: L92-02019-2287 Date of decision: May 7, 1996 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where employer failed to request… Read More »
Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC Digest no. 2.17 Section 41(2) Cite as: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued September 27, 1994 (Docket No. 145657). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc. Docket no.: L88-08050-2003 Date of decision: September 27, 1994 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »
Peter McCreedy Trucking Co v MESC Digest no. 2.11 Sections 15, 18 Cite as: Peter McCreedy Trucking Co v MESC, unpublished memorandum of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued August 26, 1994 (Docket No. 156798). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Peter McCreedy Trucking Company Docket no.: L90-11810-RO1-2187 Date of decision: August 26, 1994 View/download the… Read More »
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: The Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee was an employing unit pursuant to Section 40 and, therefore, by definition an “employer subject to this Act” under Section 41(2)(a). Therefore, employer Bruce & Roberts Inc. is a successor, having acquired 75% or more of Balderstone assets by means of bankruptcy.
R F Molitoris, DDS v MESC Digest no. 2.13 Sections 11(g), 18(d), 32a Cite as: R F Molitoris, DDS v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Macomb County Circuit Court, issued January 21, 1993 (Docket No. 92-3446-AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Wanda Forbes Employer: R.F. Molitoris, D.D.S. Docket no.: L90-06544-2224 Date of decision: January 21, 1993 View/download the full… Read More »
Trumble’s Rent-L-Center v MESC Digest no. 2.18 Sections 18(d), 21 Cite as: Trumble’s Rent-L-Center v MESC, 197 Mich App 229 (1992). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Trumble’s Rent-L-Center, Inc. Docket no.: L88-14843-1985 Date of decision: December 7, 1992 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: Where employer submitted a missing quarterly report more than 30 days after… Read More »