Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC Digest no. 2.17 Section 41(2) Cite as: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc v MESC, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan, issued September 27, 1994 (Docket No. 145657). Appeal pending: No Claimant: N/A Employer: Pioneer Cabinetry, Inc. Docket no.: L88-08050-2003 Date of decision: September 27, 1994 View/download the full decision COURT… Read More »
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: The value of pending litigation was too speculative to be considered an asset. As such the employer acquired 75% or more of the predecessor and is a successor employer under Section 41(2).
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: “If a vital integral part of the business is not transferred, regardless of how many people make up that integral part, so that the business could not continue, then there has not been a transfer of the `organization’ for the purposes of this Act.”