Phillips v UCC Digest no. 4.04 Section 48 Cite as: Phillips v UCC, 323 Mich 188 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Pleasant I. Phillips Employer: Winters and Crampton Corporation Docket no.: B7 15029 8250 Date of decision: December 17, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) The claimant has the burden of proof as to eligibility. (2)… Read More »
Dwyer v UCC Digest no. 7.04 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Dwyer v UCC, 321 Mich 178 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John Dwyer Employer: Packard Motor Car Co. Docket no.: B6 18326 5058 Date of decision: May 18, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) The claimant has the burden of proof as to eligibility. (2) A… Read More »
Copper Range Co v UCC Digest no. 10.01 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Copper Range Co v UCC, 320 Mich 460 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: James W. Austin, et al. Employer: Copper Range Co. Docket no.: B5 9204 2910 Date of decision: April 5, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where employees are threatened… Read More »
Ford Motor Co v UCC Digest no. 7.03 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Ford Motor Co v UCC, 316 Mich 468 (1947). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Drusilla Koski Employer: Ford Motor Company Docket no.: B4 3872 1751 Date of decision: January 6, 1947 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: “There is nothing in the statute to justify the… Read More »
APPEAL BOARD HOLDING: The definition of “employer,” under former MES Act Section 41(3), since amended, was not limited to situations where the “employer” had legally enforceable control over the employing unit. Section 41 was not violative of the equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Woodall Industries Inc. v. Tracy Digest No. 7.38 Section 421.28 Cite as: Woodall Industries Inc. v. Tracy, unpublished opinion of the Oakland County Circuit Court, issued Sept. 17, 1941 (Docket No. 26150). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Marie Tracy Employer: Woodall Industries, Inc. Date of decision: September 17, 1941 View/download the full decision HOLDING: The requirement… Read More »
Henry v Ford Motor Co Digest no. 20.01 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Henry v Ford Motor Co, 291 Mich 535 (1939). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Lee Henry Employer: Ford Motor Company Docket no.: Date of decision: December 19, 1939 View/download the full document SUPREME COURT HOLDING: A finding of disability for purposes of worker’s compensation does not necessarily… Read More »
Section 18(d)(2) “If at least 1 but fewer than all of the applicable quarterly reports of wages and contributions due with respect to the 12-month period ending on the computation date have been filed by an employer, the employer’s experience component shall be set so that his or her contribution rate for the calendar year… Read More »