Blanding v Kelsey Hayes – 4.06
CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: Where a contract requires payment of vacation pay in March of each year, and allows designation of a vacation shutdown period, the March payment is not remuneration.
Tag Archives: Designation of vacation
McCaleb v Harbor Industries, Inc – 4.10
COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: (1) Where contractual specification of vacation procedures includes designation of vacation periods but does not treat the allocation of vacation pay, the employer may allocate such pay as it chooses. (2) Arbitration has no role in the determination of eligibility for benefits.
Hickson v Chrysler Corp – 4.02
SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where a labor agreement provides for the allocation of vacation pay to a portion of an indefinite layoff period, the payments are remuneration and not severance pay.
Renown Stove Co v UCC – 4.21
Renown Stove Co v UCC Digest no. 4.21 Section 48 Cite as: Renown Stove Co v UCC, 328 Mich 436 (1950). Appeal pending: No Claimant: George Sheldon, et al. Employer: Renown Stove Company Docket no.: B8 5900 1 9580 Date of decision: September 11, 1950 View/download the full decision MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where the option to… Read More »