Tag Archives: Allocation of vacation pay

Van Wormer Industries v MESC – 4.03

Van Wormer Industries v MESC Digest no. 4.03 Section 48 Cite as: Van Wormer Industries v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Macomb Circuit Court, issued February 28, 1985 (Docket No. 84-2768 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Jerry L. McCullough Employer: Van Wormer Industries Docket no.: B83 21674 96043W Date of decision: February 28, 1985 View/download the full decision… Read More »

Tenneco Inc v MESC – 4.14

Tenneco Inc v MESC Digest no. 4.14 Section 48 Cite as: Tenneco Inc v MESC, unpublished opinion of the Jackson Circuit Court, issued December 30, 1983 (Docket No. 82-29572 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: John J. Brieger Employer: Tenneco, Inc. – Walker Mfg. Docket no.: B80 23129 RO1 76344 Date of decision: December 30, 1983 View/download the full… Read More »

McCaleb v Harbor Industries, Inc – 4.10

COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: (1) Where contractual specification of vacation procedures includes designation of vacation periods but does not treat the allocation of vacation pay, the employer may allocate such pay as it chooses. (2) Arbitration has no role in the determination of eligibility for benefits.

Brown v LTV Aerospace Corp – 4.01

SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) A pro-rata vacation allowance at the time of layoff is not a termination allowance and may be considered as vacation pay. (2) Where claimants are not numerous enough to require a class action, and their consolidated appeal is filed in a circuit other than Ingham, the appeal must be dismissed as to any claimant not residing in the circuit of filing.

Renown Stove Co v UCC – 4.21

Renown Stove Co v UCC Digest no. 4.21 Section 48 Cite as: Renown Stove Co v UCC, 328 Mich 436 (1950). Appeal pending: No Claimant: George Sheldon, et al. Employer: Renown Stove Company Docket no.: B8 5900 1 9580 Date of decision: September 11, 1950 View/download the full decision MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where the option to… Read More »