Cross v Tri-Fecta, Inc Digest no. 10.121 Section 29(1)(a) Cite as: Cross v Tri-Fecta, Inc, Genesee Circuit Court, No. 12-98465-AE (June 27, 2013). Appeal pending: Claimant: Michelle H. Cross Employer: Tri-Fecta, Inc. Docket no.: 12-98465-AE Date of decision: June 27, 2013 View/download the full decision CIRCUIT COURT HOLDING: When a claimant holds a part-time job and full-time job simultaneously, then voluntarily quits… Read More »
UIA v Varga Digest No. 19.12 19 USC § 2291(a)(5) Cite as: Unemployment Insurance Agency v Redlin, unpublished opinion of the Jackson County Circuit Court, issued March 20, 2006 (Docket No. 182823). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Peter Varga Employer: N/A Date of decision: March 20, 2006 View/download the full decision HOLDING: The application of agency… Read More »
UIA v Redlin Digest No. 19.11 19 USC § 2291(a)(5) Cite as: Unemployment Insurance Agency v Redlin, unpublished opinion of the Lenawee County Circuit Court, issued January 11, 2006 (Docket No. 182123). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Matthew Redlin Employer: N/A Date of decision: January 11, 2006 View/download the full decision HOLDING: Agency was not established… Read More »
SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) A pro-rata vacation allowance at the time of layoff is not a termination allowance and may be considered as vacation pay. (2) Where claimants are not numerous enough to require a class action, and their consolidated appeal is filed in a circuit other than Ingham, the appeal must be dismissed as to any claimant not residing in the circuit of filing.