Weideman v Interlakes Engineering Co Digest no. 4.07 Section 48 Cite as: Weideman v Interlakes Engineering Co, unpublished opinion of the Macomb Circuit Court, issued November 28, 1975 (Docket No. 744941 AE). Appeal pending: No Claimant: William Weideman, et al. Employer: Interlakes Engineering Company Docket no.: B73 3107 43951, et al. Date of decision: November 28, 1975 View/download the… Read More »
SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) A pro-rata vacation allowance at the time of layoff is not a termination allowance and may be considered as vacation pay. (2) Where claimants are not numerous enough to require a class action, and their consolidated appeal is filed in a circuit other than Ingham, the appeal must be dismissed as to any claimant not residing in the circuit of filing.
SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where a labor agreement provides for the allocation of vacation pay to a portion of an indefinite layoff period, the payments are remuneration and not severance pay.
Mikolaicziak v MESC Digest no. 7.07 Section 28(1)(c) Cite as: Mikolaicziak v MESC, 40 Mich App 61 (1972). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Leo J. Mikolaicziak, et al. Employer: Twin Oaks Golf Club, Inc. Docket no.: B69 573 37067 Date of decision: April 25, 1972 View/download the full decision COURT OF APPEALS HOLDING: (1) Unpaid service as a… Read More »
Renown Stove Co v UCC Digest no. 4.21 Section 48 Cite as: Renown Stove Co v UCC, 328 Mich 436 (1950). Appeal pending: No Claimant: George Sheldon, et al. Employer: Renown Stove Company Docket no.: B8 5900 1 9580 Date of decision: September 11, 1950 View/download the full decision MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT HOLDING: Where the option to… Read More »
Phillips v UCC Digest no. 4.04 Section 48 Cite as: Phillips v UCC, 323 Mich 188 (1948). Appeal pending: No Claimant: Pleasant I. Phillips Employer: Winters and Crampton Corporation Docket no.: B7 15029 8250 Date of decision: December 17, 1948 View/download the full decision SUPREME COURT HOLDING: (1) The claimant has the burden of proof as to eligibility. (2)… Read More »